Here is an article that is geared more towards a member of the legal community.

 

It is all the rage these days to complain that arbitration has become too much like litigation. Arbitration takes too long. It is too expensive. It involves too much discovery. It requires too many briefs. It takes too much time to schedule a hearing and too much time to get a decision. It has acquired all the detriments of court litigation but without the right to appeal. Complaints of this sort abound.

In many respects, such complaints are valid. At least they accurately reflect the reality of how many arbitrations are conducted these days, under the governance of various sets of rules used by many arbitration providers.

 

Views: 73

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's slightly amusing how people are complaining about arbitration. If they put that energy into actually solving their dispute, they wouldn't have to be dealing with the arbitration at all? What are people looking for in resolving their legal disputes? Some complain about litigation, then complain about ADR. Are people really complaining? Or do news stories conveniently come across those who actually are holding the system back from effectively working in the public eye?

RSS

@ADRHub Tweets

ADRHub is supported and maintained by the Negotiation & Conflict Resolution Program at Creighton University

Members

© 2024   Created by ADRhub.com - Creighton NCR.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service